A country’s level of development and its level of income are often seen as synonymous. Many, thus, understand development as poorer countries “catching up” with richer ones. Once the poorer countries catch up, they cease to be “developing” and become “developed”. A closer look, however, reveals a different story. First, development is more complex than getting from A to B: it is a continuous and never-ending process that is even reversible. It follows a wide diversity of pathways depending on a country’s specific geography and history. Second, the emergence of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) reflects the fact that development has multiple economic, social and environmental dimensions, beyond income. Moreover, and as the COVID-19 crisis has illustrated all too well, shocks have become increasingly global in our hyper-connected world, reflecting the interdependence amongst national, regional and international levels.
Click to read more..
International co-operation practices and frameworks have not always recognised the multidimensional nature of development and the changing global context. We need a new approach to international co-operation and development, within a multilateral system that is able to take on increasingly shared global challenges whilst accounting for countries’ domestic realities and citizens demands. The global community must also support the design of national development strategies that are aligned with global goals and respond to the origins of increasing discontent. For several years now, the Development Centre has been pushing this paradigm shift forward through its work on Development in Transition (DiT), gathering countries at all levels of development around the same table and across a diverse range of policy communities, recognising the multidimensional and complex nature of development. A central premise of our work is that economic growth is not a good measure of human wellbeing and development. We need multidimensional indicators that enable us to measure what we treasure – people’s wellbeing and the health of our planet – beyond GDP.
The pandemic has exacerbated pre-existing inequalities and vulnerabilities among and within countries, exposing the flaws of a multilateral system that had already failed to address these issues after the global financial crisis of 2007-2008. We need a new model consisting in strategies and reforms that go beyond reconstruction and rebuilding, focusing instead on transforming globalisation and renewing the efforts and tools of our multilateral system to benefit the many rather than the few. We need to fundamentally rethink how countries – at all levels of development – interact with one another to design better policies, practices and partnerships adapted to the changing global landscape.
This compilation gathers a selection of blogs contributing to the Development in Transition framework since its emergence to lessons that we can begin to draw from the pandemic. The first blog sets the foundations of the approach, outlining the new metrics, partnerships and tools to shift from top-down, donor-recipient ties to inclusive co-operation among equals, reflecting the current global landscape. The second part of this compilation looks at the issue of graduation, demonstrating that the trajectories of developing countries are far from guaranteed linear paths. As countries are sometimes “rushed to graduate” from aid based on their GDP per capita, and despite still facing significant vulnerabilities, they are confronted with an array of challenges that can erode and even reverse hard-won development gains. The authors depict these challenges and offer solutions – through both national efforts and international support – to prevent countries from falling into the so-called “middle-income trap”. In the third part, the authors focus on the COVID-19 crisis, and its catalyst effect, exposing the failures of the multilateral system to respond to a crisis on a planetary scale and accelerating the need to reform and shift towards new sustainable and inclusive development models that strengthen
countries’ and communities’ resilience against systemic shocks, driven by principles of solidarity and co-responsibility among and between developed and developing countries.
Mario Pezzini
Director of the OECD Development Centre & Special Advisor to the OECD Secretary General on Development
1) What is Development in Transition?

Development in transition
By Alicia Barcena, Stefano Manservisi and Mario Pezzini
Click for the blog’s key takeaways
2) Development is a continuous process: no one-size-fits-all

Overcoming the Challenges of the Transition and Exit from Aid
By Annalisa Prizzon
Click for the blog’s key takeaways
For a successful transition and exit from aid:

Middle-income countries should not be rushed to graduate
By Otaviano Canuto, Matheus Cavallari, and Tiago Ribeiro dos Santos
Click for the blog’s key takeaways
The measures which can be taken to help middle-income countries (MICs) avoid or exit the middle-income trap include:
- Accumulating human capital and developing high cognitive skills: multilateral development banks (MDBs) can help MICs design effective policies to increase the level of learning-adjusted school years (a metric that combines quantity and quality of schooling) for a relatively low cost.
- Fostering entrepreneurship: MDBs can significantly help MICs by increasing the scope of evaluations like the Doing Business Report, to better and transparently reflect the business environment of the countries they examine.
- Reducing greenhouse gas emissions: MICs are the cheapest environment where technologies can be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, while expanding economic activity. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in MICs is in the interest of the whole world.

Upgrading International Development Co-operation
By Alicia Barcena, Stefano Manservisi, and Mario Pezzini
Click for the blog’s key takeaways
3) COVID-19: A wake-up call exposing the outstanding failures of and need to reform international co-operation

COVID-19: A game changer for the Global South and international co-operation?
By Debapriya Bhattacharya and Sarah Sabin Khan
Click for the blog’s key takeaways

COVID-19 and the human development crisis: what have we learnt?
By Pedro Conceição and Mario Pezzini
Click for the blog’s key takeaways

Beyond vested interests: Reforming international co-operation post COVID-19
By Imme Scholz
Click for the blog’s key takeaways